{"id":11801,"date":"2023-02-23T13:28:21","date_gmt":"2023-02-23T05:28:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fld2.mcu.edu.tw\/%e5%90%84%e6%9c%9f%e7%9b%ae%e9%8c%84\/"},"modified":"2023-12-08T14:37:15","modified_gmt":"2023-12-08T06:37:15","slug":"%e5%90%84%e6%9c%9f%e7%9b%ae%e9%8c%84","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/fld.mcu.edu.tw\/en\/%e5%90%84%e6%9c%9f%e7%9b%ae%e9%8c%84\/","title":{"rendered":"Issue Index"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"cs-content\" class=\"cs-content\"><div class=\"x-section e11801-1 m93t-0\"><div class=\"x-row x-container max width e11801-2 m93t-1 m93t-2 m93t-3 m93t-4\"><div class=\"x-row-inner\"><div class=\"x-col e11801-3 m93t-7 m93t-8 m93t-9 m93t-a m93t-b\"><i class=\"x-icon e11801-4 m93t-g\" aria-hidden=\"true\" data-x-icon-s=\"&#xf5d9;\"><\/i><div class=\"x-text x-text-headline e11801-5 m93t-h m93t-i m93t-j m93t-k\"><div class=\"x-text-content\"><div class=\"x-text-content-text\"><h1 class=\"x-text-content-text-primary\"><strong><span class=\"thim-color\">Issue Index<\/span><\/strong><\/h1><\/div><\/div><\/div><hr class=\"x-line e11801-6 m93t-o m93t-p\"><\/hr><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"x-row x-container max width e11801-7 m93t-1 m93t-2 m93t-3 m93t-4\"><div class=\"x-row-inner\"><div class=\"x-col e11801-8 m93t-9 m93t-a m93t-b\"><div class=\"x-row e11801-9 m93t-1 m93t-2 m93t-5\"><div class=\"x-row-inner\"><div class=\"x-col e11801-10 m93t-7 m93t-9 m93t-a m93t-b m93t-c\"><div class=\"x-row e11801-11 m93t-1 m93t-4 m93t-6\"><div class=\"x-row-inner\"><div class=\"x-col e11801-12 m93t-9 m93t-b m93t-d\"><div class=\"x-text x-text-headline e11801-13 m93t-j m93t-k m93t-l m93t-m\"><div class=\"x-text-content\"><div class=\"x-text-content-text\"><h1 class=\"x-text-content-text-primary\">Index of MCU Law Review on Cases and Administrative Interpretation Issues<\/h1><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"x-col e11801-14 m93t-9 m93t-a m93t-b m93t-e\"><div class=\"x-text x-text-headline e11801-15 m93t-i m93t-j m93t-m m93t-n\"><div class=\"x-text-content\"><div class=\"x-text-content-text\"><h1 class=\"x-text-content-text-primary\"><table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"103\" style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Volumes<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"360\" style=\"text-align: center\">\n<p><b>Articles<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center\"><b>Authors<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td rowspan=\"5\" width=\"103\">\n<p><strong>MCU Law Review on Cases and Administrative Interpretation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>December 2022, <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Volume 4<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Ambiguities in \u201cNonobviousness\u201d Rendered by the PHOSITA \u2013 An Analysis of Issues Related to Amici Curiae of 105 Xing-Zhuan-Geng (I) 4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><span style=\"font-family: inherit;font-size: inherit\">Hsieh<\/span>,\u00a0<span style=\"font-family: inherit;font-size: inherit\">Tsu-<\/span><span style=\"font-family: inherit;font-size: inherit\">Sung<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>Discussion on Patient Autonomy and Physician's Reasonable Clinical Professional Discretion - Comment on the Criminal Judgment No. 427 of the Tainan Branch of the Taiwan High Court in 2017<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Lu, Ying-Chieh<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>The Effective Time of the Partition of the Inheritance Determined by the Will-- With a Discussion on the Taiwan New Taipei District Court, Judgment Chong-Chia-Su No.43 (2015)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Wu, Pey-Chun<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>Boundaries of the Right to Information Privacy - A Critical Review of the Taipei High Administrative Court Decision (109) Su No. 275<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Lin, Her<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>Cryptocurrency Scam and Illegal Public Officering-Comment on the Criminal Judgement of Supreme Court 110 Taishentzu 5314<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Lin, Rong-Quan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td rowspan=\"5\" width=\"103\">\n<p><strong>MCU Law Review on Cases and Administrative Interpretation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>December 2021, <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Volume 3<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>Trade Secret Infringement and the Reversing Engineering Defense - Reviewing Taiwan Supreme Court 110 Tai-Shang 3193 Decision<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Jerry G. Fong \uff1b Juning Fong<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>The analogous application of Article 425-1 of Civil Code?- Analysis of Supreme Court's 107th Tai Shang Zi No. 1380 Civil Judgment<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Huang, Yu-Hui<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>Clarification of the importance of the court in relation to audiovisual interrogation-on the supreme court case of 97 Tai Sun 2537<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Hsu, Jung-Yi<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>The Disputes over the Recognition and Amortization of the Intangible Assets in Tax Litigation-Comment on the Supreme Administrative Court Judgement No.567 in 2020<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Lin, Rong-Quan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>After crime of adultery is decriminalized, how should Relatives in Civil Law strengthen the legal effect? -Centered on Interpretation No. 791<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Hou, Sin-Yu<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td rowspan=\"4\" width=\"103\">\n<p><strong>MCU Law Review on Cases and Administrative Interpretation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>December 2020, <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Volume 2<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>Area of Protection of Freedom to Broadcast<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Lin, Yiren<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>On Nursing Staff's Liability for Criminal Negligence: Studying on the Cases of the Penal Judgment No.1059 made by Supreme Court at 2017 and the Penal Judgment No.809 made by Supreme Court at<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Su, Jung Lien; Lu, Ying-Chieh<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>The Obligation of Immediate Reference of Deriving Evidence from the Communications Surveillance, which is not Related to the Purpose of the Surveillance: Based on the Two Judgements onSupreme Court<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Hsu, Jung-Yi<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>Commentary on Interpretation No 791 of Constitutional Court from the Point of View of the Protection of Children and Adolescents<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Lin, Shih-Chin<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td rowspan=\"4\" width=\"103\">\n<p><strong><span>MCU Law Review on Cases and Administrative Interpretation<br \/>\n<\/span>December 2020,<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Volume 1<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>A Case Review on the Taipei City CPA Association committed concerted action: Comment on the Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court No. 705 in 2012<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Yen, Ting-Tong<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>Is there a necessity of concordant intent in the administrative contract ?\uff0dSupreme Administrative Court\u2019s (2015) Pan Zi Precedent No. 778<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Chen, Shin-Min<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\">\n<p>Is the Limitation of Compulsory Portion Apply for Gift Causa Mortis--Comments on the (106) Tai-Shang No.2731 Decision Rendered by the Supreme Court<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Wu, Pey-Chun<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"360\" style=\"text-align: center\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Calculation the reasonable royalties of patent infringement damages on the basis of historical royalties : A Case Analysis on Supreme Court Judgment No. 104-Tai-Shang-Tzu-671<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Chen, Hui Chun<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p><\/h1><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"x-col e11801-16 m93t-9 m93t-a m93t-f\"><hr class=\"x-line e11801-17 m93t-p m93t-q\"><\/hr><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Issue IndexIndex of MCU Law Review on Cases and Administrative Interpretation Issues Volumes Articles Authors MCU Law Review on Cases and Administrative Interpretation December 2022, Volume 4 Ambiguities in \u201cNonobviousness\u201d Rendered by the PHOSITA \u2013 An Analysis of Issues Related to Amici Curiae of 105 Xing-Zhuan-Geng (I) 4 Hsieh,\u00a0Tsu-Sung Discussion on Patient Autonomy and Physician&#8217;s Reasonable Clinical Professional Discretion &#8211; &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"template-blank-4.php","meta":{"_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"_vp_format_video_url":"","_vp_image_focal_point":[]},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fld.mcu.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11801"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fld.mcu.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fld.mcu.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fld.mcu.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/36"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fld.mcu.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11801"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/fld.mcu.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11801\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12641,"href":"https:\/\/fld.mcu.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11801\/revisions\/12641"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fld.mcu.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}